OPENING THE BOOK OF REVELATION –PART 25 Listen to Audio
Sept. 20, 2009
Chapter 7 brings us to another encounter in REV with the word, “Israel”—
Attention needs to be given to the meaning in this context—
1) It is common among non-dispensational teachers to declare that the
144,000 called ‘Israel’ in ch.7 to be an idealized expression of both Jew
and Gentile. This is often predicated upon views of 3 other passages
that require some consideration:
a. Romans 9:24-26—some view Paul’s use of Hosea 2:23 and 1:10 as
quoted to mean that God has replaced ethnic Israel with a spiritual “Israel”
or the Church [I will say to those who were not my people (Gentiles)
you are my people]. Such a perspective then excludes ethnic Israel or
the descendants of Abraham, Isaac & Jacob from receiving the large
body of OT promises and declares the church as now being spiritual
‘Israel’.
b. Galatians 6:16- the words “as many as walk according to this rule,
peace and mercy be upon them, and upon the Israel of God”- are taken
as referring, not to ethnic Israel, but to the church which is labeled here
“Israel of God”. Sometimes this view of the Church being spiritual Israel
is called replacement theology (meaning that the church has replaced ethnic
Israel).
Such a view represents what is called “covenant theology” (in contrast
with dispensational theology)---expressive of this is a quote by Rushdoony-
“A further heresy clouds premillennial interpretations of scripture—their
exaltation of racism into a divine principle. Every attempt to bring the Jew
back into prophecy as a Jew is to give race and works a priority over grace
and Christ’s work and is nothing…less than paganism. It is significant that
premillennialism is almost invariably associated with Arminianism, i.e. the
introduction of race into prophetic perspectives is accompanied by… the
introduction of works into the order of salvation…..there can be no
compromise with this vicious heresy.”
c. Romans 9:6- “but it is not as though the word of God has taken no
effect. For they are not all Israel, who are of Israel.”- here, the replacement
theology declares that God has clearly rejected any claim to the ethnic or literal
group called “Israel” by pointing out that beyond race, God favors only true
Israel (the church). The teaching is framed so as to infer that physical/ethnic
Israel is set-aside or disqualified and only spiritual Israel (the church) remains.
2. In response to this confusion, we might consider the following:
a. Romans 9:24-26- Paul quotes Hosea as an illustration of God’s mercy.
That is, Hosea is speaking of divine judgment on ethnic Israel in his
own lifetime and then, the later recovery of ethnic Israel as God’s people.
Page 2
Note in 1:9 “you are not my people” and then in vs.10 “Yet the number
of …..Israel shall be as the sand of the sea—vs.11 “then the children of
Judah and ….Israel shall be gathered together”—the displacement is
temporary and the recovery is of literal Israel, not a replacement by a
spiritual church. Ethnic Israel will be called “the sons of the living God”
b. Galatians 6:16- Paul is simply expressing his wish for peace/mercy to be
shown to those who live by the principles of vs. 15, where neither
circumcision (being Jewish) nor uncircumcision (being non-Jewish)
is the critical factor. His addition of “upon the Israel of God” only shows
Paul’s passion for ethnic Israel (see Rom. 9:1-3 and 10:1) and should NOT
be construed to mean OT promises to ethnic Israel are not longer valid or
that they have been “spiritualized” into the church.
c. Romans 9:6- correctly, Paul is expressing that not all of ethnic Israel is
spiritual. That is, within the ethnic group Israel are both believers
and unbelievers. Once again, this should not be construed to mean that
ethnic Israel has been replaced by spiritual Israel (being the church).
In vs.7-13, Paul makes clear that God’s elective purpose will be fulfilled
as it was with Jacob and the unbelieving of Israel will not receive mercy.
That God still has purposes for ethnic Israel can be clearly seen in Romans
11:1-2 where a “remnant of ethnic Israel” has believed- vs.5-6, based on
grace, just as it is based on grace for all. Further, 11:28-29 makes clear
ethnic Israel is still “beloved for the sake of the fathers (who are all ethnic Jews).
Dispensationalism embraces a divine plan for both the ethnic people called
Israel and for the church as well with important eschatological aspects. Those
of Covenant theology (replacement) see only one plan for the church, whether
in OT or NT.