April 3,
2005
Chap.18,
verses 5-11- In Corinth, Paul is proclaiming Jesus is the
Christ,
perhaps indicating a different way to
present the gospel—note 17:3—here,
emphasizing the historical Jesus matched the
OT Messiah.
The reaction is negative; opposed themselves
(attitude) and
blasphemed
(action). Paul
then shakes his garments
in a gesture of disassociation (13:51) adding “Your blood be upon your
own heads”—see Ezk.3:18-19.
“From
now own I will go to the Gentiles”—Paul is indicating the movement of the ministry of
the Kingdom of
God being given (by preaching) to
Gentiles.
See 20:28. Paul will continue to proclaim the
gospel to Jews.
Paul then moves to the house of Justus, who worshipped
God—indicating a Gentile convert and likely a Roman citizen. Some manuscripts add “Titius” and perhaps he is the same as Gaius in I Cor.1:14.
Another convert is the Jewish leader, Crispus, also in I
Cor.1:14. Then, Luke adds “many of the
Corinthians, hearing believed and were
baptized.”
Then Luke records an appearance of
the Lord Jesus in a vision to Paul.
It may be that with the hostility
seen at Philippi (16:20-24), Paul is growing fearful of
another beating, possibly at Corinth. Thus, the Lord, in His
mercy,
gives a word of encouragement to the
apostle. “I am with you and no
man shall set on thee to hurt thee” is spoken to calm Paul’s anxiety.
Luke then adds that Paul’s ministry in Corinth continues 18 months. Simply put, Paul does not leave
Corinth despite opposition and in view of
Christ’s comforting words continues his ministry.
Chap.18,
verses 12-17- now the opposition acts—Luke tells us of Gallio, the proconsul of
Achaia. Here we have an
excellent illustration of Luke’s historical accuracy. The provinces of the
Roman Empire were divided into those ruled by
the Senate (with a proconsul) and those under the rule of the Emperor (with
a
propraetor). These circumstances could change quickly
and often. Luke speaks of strategoi
(Greek for propraetor) at
Philippi (under the Emperor) in
16:22-24 and then of a proconsul
here at
Corinth (under the
Senate).
Gallio
was the son of Marcus Seneca (rhetorician) and younger brother of
Lucius Seneca, the Stoic philosopher,
politician and dramatist. Gallio would later die under Nero’s suspicions about 65
AD.
The judgment seat
of Gallio is called the bema—same
word for Judgment Seat of Christ in II Cor.5. Here, the Jews accuse Paul of “persuading men to
worship God contrary to the law.” The Jews, no doubt, mean the “law of
Moses” and hope to have Gallio act on their behalf to
stop Paul.
What follows is Gallio dismissing their case immediately and thereby making
the Christian faith a legal religion. The importance of this incident is that
Gallio’s action as a proconsul would become a legal
precedent for other rulers to consider.
Luke includes as an essential apologetic for the Christian faith in
Page 2
Acts of the
Apostles.
Oddly enough, immediately the Greeks of Corinth reveal a only slightly hidden anti-semitism by beating Sosthenes, another
ruler of the synagogue. This may be
the Sosthenes of I Cor.1:1 but we do not
know.
Gallio is indifferent to their brutality
against the Jewish leader.
Chap.18,
verse 18-23 - And Paul tarried there a good while…- it is believed that during this
time (summer of 51 AD) that Paul would write both I Thessalonians and II
Thessalonians—dealing with matters related to the
imminent return of Christ for the
Church. In I Thess. 2:17-18, Paul indicates his intense desire to return
to see them again. The Luke records
“he took leave of the
brethren and sailed thence into
Syria,
and with him Priscilla and Aquila”. While
Syria
(Antioch vs22) is his long term goal, he
will first go to
Cenchrea where his hair
is cut in view of a vow.
This “vow and haircut” incident is not
clear—most connect with with a sort
of
Nazarite practice and often expressed
thanksgiving with the shaven hair burned at
Jerusalem as an act of dedication. Why the apostle of grace would do such
here must be placed under his I Cor.9:20 “unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that
I might win Jews”. We know Paul’s
passion for the conversion of Israel was very strong- Romans
9:1-3.
From Cenchrea,
he sails on to Ephesus, remaining only a short time and
indicating his desire to “keep this feast that is
coming in Jerusalem”.
Likely, this is referring to the
Passover of the spring of 52 AD.
His next movement is landing at Caesaria and on to
Jerusalem (expressed under “gone up and saluted the
church”. After this, he
goes to Antioch
where he had begun back in
15:41. This ends his 2nd
missionary journey.