6/2/04
Chapter
2, verse 1- “day of Pentecost”- this would be the 50th
day
after Passover- it related to Lev.
23:15-17 and what was called
the
“feast of
harvest or firstfruits”- Ex.23:16. It was one of 3 times that male
Israelites were to appear before the Lord- Ex.23:14. It was commonly called the
“feast of weeks”- Deut.16:9. By the
first century, it was connected with the giving of the Law at Sinai due to a
similar time frame- see Ex.19:1.
“in one accord in one
place”- the place was likely the “upper room” of 1:13 and their unity
was in obedience to Jesus’ command in 1:4 and their join seeking the Lord-
1:14.
Chapter
2, verse 2- If one accepts that the feast observed the giving
of the Law at Sinai, then it becomes obvious that this coming of the Holy
Spirit-
(a) expresses continuity with the OT =God spoke at Sinai and now
speaks thru His Spirit
(b) yet a
difference is clear; the first coming was Law-focused, whereas, under the New
Covenant, the focus is on Christ and the Holy
Spirit.
God chooses to use both
audio and visual elements to dramatize
this New Covenant work. Each of 3 items are used:
1) WIND- wind or air – the
Hebrew,
ruah and the Greek, pneuma may be either wind or spirit. Ezekiel 37 gave
Israel hope for restoration and
recovery under powers of the wind/spirit of the LORD. The “sound” of this wind may connect
with the sounds of the giving of the Law at Sinai- Ex.19:16,
19.
This wind “filled all the house”-
perhaps expressing the potency
and
availability of God’s Spirit in this new era.
2)
FIRE- this has been most connected with God’s presence-
see
burning
bush in Ex.3:2-5 and pillar of fire in Ex.13:21. Some connect John Baptist’s remarks in
Lk.3:16 “baptize with the Holy Spirit and with fire” believing Acts 2 fulfills
that remark. However, in the
context of Luke 3:16-17,
fire seems more judgmental than
affirming.
Observe the phrase “sat upon each of
them”- vs.3—this may note the change from God’s Spirit working thru the nation
of Israel
in the OT to God’s use of individuals in the
NT.
Page
2
3)
TONGUES- the visuall
is of a divided tongue “like as of fire” in vs.3 followed by the experience in
vs. 4 of being “filled with the Holy Spirit and … to speak with other
tongues.”
While the first two elements have clear
representations, “to speak with other tongues” lacks OT illustration (possible
exception is
I
Sam.10:5-10). But it is clear that
in Acts 2, tongues are actual
languages
spoken on earth- see vs.6.
NOTES:
1) Tongues are languages used by
nations on earth- 2:6
2) This ability to communicate in
various languages serves as a
sign- Acts
2:7-12, 10:45-46 and I
Cor.14:22.
3) This “sign” (Mark 16:17) gave evidence of the
miraculous power
of the
apostles, affirming them as God’s spokesmen- Heb. 2:4 and
II
Cor.12:12.
4) It also equipped the apostles to quickly
communicate the gospel to
other nations,
facilitating the expansion of missionary outreach.
5) In Acts 2, those who heard and saw this
miraculous “equipping”
were Jews
gathered in Jerusalem from many nations- Acts
2:9-11.
Evangelizing them was important in the
initial spread of the gospel
message to
geographical areas away from Jerusalem.
6) Later, in I Cor.14:21-22, Paul would
show that tongues were a
negative “sign”
of Israel’s unbelief, paralleling the
unbelief of the
generation of
Isaiah’s day. He does this to show
the limitations of
the gift of
tongues to believers at Corinth who saw “tongues”
as
a means of
self-promotion (pseudo-spiritual superiority). Note in
I Cor.14 the word “unknown” is supplied
by the translators, but is
not in the
text. This has led some to suggest
the tongues in Acts 2
and that in I
Cor.14 are not
identical.