STUDIES IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN- PART
46
2/14/07
chapter 8,
verse 12- “I am the light of the world”- these words may be given in view of the lighting
of the Candlelabra at the
Temple (Jesus is the greater light) or
in view of the sunrise (vs.2). The
use of “light” has
already been established in John as a means to express the uniqueness of Jesus-
see
1:9 and
3:19. It is
a motif of contrast (darkness) in order to express
the
conflict of truth and
error. In Psa.27:1,
the LORD is Israel’s light as is the word of God in
Psa.119:105. The wording in vs.11
–“shall not
walk…”uses the double negative for emphasis. Following Jesus dispels confusion &
darkness.
Merrill Tenney-“Jesus professed to be not only the inexhaustible
source of spiritual nourishment, but he also was the genuine light by which
truth and falsehood could be distinguished and by which direction could be
established.”
“light of life” carries a qualitative (genitive
case) aspect. It reveals that
the
“light”
provides or carries with it “life” in its most beneficial and fulfilling
form.
See 10:10 and Luke
9:24.
Jesus came, not to give mere
length of life, but to enrich and fulfill each believer’s heart—see
Eph.3:17-19.
Chapter 8, verses
13-59 provide an extended dialogue of conflict with the religious
leaders. It will reveal, not only
the spiritual darkness of such leaders,
but give us important truths related
to the Person of Jesus found nowhere else.
In vs.13, the Pharisees key on His
assertion “I am the light..” by
challenging
the verifiability of His claim. They deny its truthfulness by saying
Jesus cannot witness to Himself. But it must be considered that
“light” establishes its claim. It
does so, not by arguments, but by shining. [Leon Morris] His response is to challenge their logic
by declaring that He knows both His origin and destiny, which they miss entirely
and then adds in vs.15, that they “judge according to the
flesh”. Flesh, here, is
like 7:24 where He pointed out they judged according to
appearance; it is limited and may be prone to error. He adds that He does not (double neg.)
judge (in that manner) anyone, “but if I do judge,
My judgment is true”. The accuracy of His judgment is based on
His intimacy with the Father, who “sent
me”.
In vs.17-18, He then explains how
His words & witness do not ignore or
violate
the Law, which required 2
witnesses. The two witnesses on His
behalf are
He, Himself and the
Father. Recall
5:36-37. Also note the words “I am One..”
that suggests Ex. 3:14 and
Deut.6:4.
The question in vs.19 may be sarcastic
or expressing their bewilderment.
It
prompts Jesus to assert that these
leaders do not know the Father. It
follows that had they known (with relationship) Jesus, they would have known the
Father as well. This is another way
of stating the truth of 5:22-23. Throughout John’s gospel, Jesus depicts
a unique intimacy between He and the
Father.
Vs.20 informs us of the location of this
dialogue and how Jesus was providentially protected until the “hour” of
fulfillment.
Page 2
Chapter 8, verses
21-26- Jesus returns to His planned absence (7:33-36)
adding the ominous “you shall die in your
sin”. Their confusion is
evident in
vs.22.
Jesus contrasts Himself with these
religious leaders: You are from
beneath,
which would be understood as hell or
lower regions; I am from
above (3:31).
“You
are of this world” which is greedy, violent, lustful and malicious; and
“I am not of this
world” (15:18, 18:36). Apparently, Jesus wishes to make
clear
that His life and ministry has no
relation or similarity to theirs!
In vs.24, Jesus points them to the
result (die in your
sins) as well as the cause (if you do not believe
that I am He). Here, He
makes it personal;
that is, this is not a mere academic
argument, but has long-term and serious
effects. Jesus deals with the concrete, not the
abstract. He promotes
that
attitudes and choices have
consequences!
Vs.25 reveals how dense these leaders
are! “Who are you?”
triggers Jesus’ simple words “just what I have been
saying to you from the beginning”.
Vs.26 explains there is more for
Him to say and He is supported by the One
who sent him that is true, yet they
do not understand Him.
Vs.28 –“when you lift up the
Son of Man..”- this
lift up refers to His
Cross -3:14- or suffering; yet, it can also refer to His
exaltation that follows
His suffering- see
12:23 & 34- “glorified”. The
movement from suffering-to-glory
is seen as a unit in Phil. 2:8-11
and Eph.4:8-11. Jesus then
reiterates His dependency on the Father and that His teaching has its source in
the Father.
This being true, it magnifies the
sin of these religious leaders against Him
into sin against the
Father.